Zum Inhalt springen

For teams & organizations

Integrate AI meaningfully into your grant funding work

For nonprofit organizations, foundations, municipalities, universities, and public institutions that don't just want to try out AI, but integrate it into their actual work processes.

In many organizations, two things are happening at once: some team members already experiment with AI tools every day, while others are just getting started. At the same time, new questions keep coming up — about data protection, tool selection, internal guidelines, quality assurance, and how AI really fits into grant funding work.

I help you turn all of this into a shared, sustainable way of working: with training, hands-on formats, concrete use cases, and support during implementation.

Why team training makes sense

In many teams, AI has long since arrived — it just hasn't been sorted out together yet.

Some team members already use ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Langdock, or other tools regularly. Others are unsure what's allowed, what's useful, and where to even begin.

At the same time, grant funding teams are under pressure: less time, higher requirements, more complex funding programs, more coordination — and always another tight deadline.

A single introductory seminar can provide orientation. Sometimes that's enough for a start.

But if AI is really going to become part of your grant funding work, you need more: concrete use cases from your organization, well-prepared context materials, first prompts, assistants, or skills — and a plan for what happens after the first workshop.

That's exactly what my team offerings are for.

My approach for teams

I don't work with teams on “AI” in the abstract — we work on your real tasks.

That might be grant research, project ideas, application texts, internal knowledge bases, funding strategies, impact logic models, reports, or recurring coordination processes.

The foundation is my KIAD approach:

Kontext · Input & Interaktion · Assistenten · Dokumentation (context · input & interaction · assistants · documentation)

In other words: we don't just look at how to write a better prompt. We look at what information AI needs, how you can work with it effectively, which recurring tasks can be turned into assistants, agent skills, or workflows — and how you document what works.

The goal is not for everyone on your team to become an “AI expert”.

The goal is for you to use AI with more confidence and structure, in a way that truly fits your work.

What working together can look like

Working together doesn't have to start with a big process.

We usually begin with a clearly defined first step: either an Impulsseminar (a compact introductory seminar), if you first want to give a larger group some orientation, or a Praxisworkshop (a hands-on workshop), if you'd rather work directly on your own tasks.

If it then becomes clear that you want to build AI into your grant funding work more deliberately, the next sensible step is a longer working format: the KI-Werkstatt (an in-depth AI working lab). There, we work on selected real use cases from your organization.

The outcome of this Werkstatt is a strategic roadmap: a clear assessment of which prompts, assistants, agent skills, data contexts, or workflows make sense for you next, and which steps should take priority.

This roadmap can then lead into ongoing monthly support.

That way, it doesn't end with one good workshop — you have a path from initial orientation through concrete implementation to anchoring AI in your everyday work.

1. Getting started: Impulsseminar or Praxisworkshop

The right first step depends on what you need right now.

An Impulsseminar works well if you want to bring many people up to a shared level of knowledge. We cover the most important ways to use AI in grant funding work and talk about opportunities, limitations, data protection, and typical use cases.

A Praxisworkshop is the better fit if you already have concrete questions, projects, or materials to bring along. Then we work directly on your tasks: project ideas, application texts, funding programs, past applications, or typical processes from your day-to-day work.

Possible format:

  • Impulsseminar: 1.5 to 2 hours · online or in person · also suitable for larger groups
  • Praxisworkshop: half-day or full-day · online or in person · ideal for smaller teams

2. KI-Werkstatt

If, after this first step, you realize you want to build AI into your grant funding work more deliberately, I recommend a longer working format.

In the KI-Werkstatt, we no longer work on isolated examples but on selected real use cases from your organization.

These might include:

  • an application wiki or internal knowledge base
  • an assistant or agent skill for project development
  • a feedback assistant for application texts
  • a workflow for funding research
  • preparing past applications as context material
  • first AI guidelines for your team
  • a process for quality assurance and documentation
  • a prototype for a small digital helper

The Werkstatt ends with a strategic roadmap.

In it, we capture: What is already usable? What needs further development? Which steps take priority? Which materials, data, or decisions are still missing? And which tasks can you handle internally — or have supported externally?

Possible format:

one to two Werkstatt days · online, in person, or combined · with preparation and follow-up

3. Monthly support

The roadmap can then lead into ongoing monthly support.

It makes sense if you don't want the ideas you've developed to sit idle, but instead want to bring them into your grant funding work and internal processes step by step.

Possible elements include:

  • further developing your AI use cases
  • reviewing prompts, assistants, agent skills, or workflows
  • preparing your existing materials and data contexts
  • internal training modules for different levels of experience
  • support with guidelines, documentation, and knowledge sharing
  • developing small digital helpers or local tools
  • if needed: bringing in network partners for funding research, grant applications, or technical implementation

The scope depends on your needs and is agreed on together after the Werkstatt.

Typical topics for your AI practice

The content is shaped by your questions, tools, and work processes. Frequent topics include:

grant research with AI
developing project ideas and project outlines
understanding and describing your target groups better
analyzing and revising existing application texts
building application wikis or internal knowledge bases
making past applications usable as context material
developing prompts and prompt databases for your team
building your own AI assistants, agent skills, or workflows
checking funding criteria and testing application texts against requirements
developing feedback assistants for final polishing
creating AI guidelines for your organization
clarifying data protection, tool selection, and internal rules
working with audio recordings and transcriptions
creating presentations, summaries, and internal decision papers
preparing budgets and impact logic models with AI
recognizing and avoiding typical flaws in AI-generated texts

If you already use an AI tool

Many organizations have already chosen a tool or are in the process of doing so: ChatGPT Team, Microsoft Copilot, Langdock, Claude, Mistral, or another solution, for example.

That's a good thing.

Because then we don't have to talk about AI in the abstract — we can look directly at:

  • What can your tool actually do?
  • Which features are relevant for your grant funding work?
  • How can your materials be integrated safely and sensibly?
  • Which tasks are a good fit for prompts, assistants, agent skills, or workflows?
  • Where do you need clear rules or technical support?

I bring the grant funding and teaching perspective. When things get very technical, I work with trusted partners as needed — for example for technical reviews, tool setups, or implementing more complex solutions.

Who this is for

This offering is a good fit for:

  • nonprofit organizations
  • foundations
  • gGmbHs (nonprofit limited companies)
  • municipalities
  • universities
  • public institutions
  • associations and networks
  • teams that regularly research, apply for, or manage grant funding

It's especially valuable if you're already noticing:

  • individual people use AI, but there's no shared way of working yet
  • you've introduced an AI tool, but how to use it in everyday work is still unclear
  • grant funding work needs to become more efficient without losing quality
  • you want to develop your own prompts, assistants, or skills for recurring tasks
  • you need orientation on data protection, tool usage, and internal guidelines
  • you don't just want to understand AI in theory, but try it out on real tasks

This offering is less suited if you're looking for purely technical software development or want to use AI exclusively for general marketing or sales automation.

Collaboration and network

My focus is on training, concept development, and the practical use of AI in grant funding work.

But team projects in particular sometimes raise additional questions: classic funding research, grant applications, research funding, technical reviews, or implementing more complex workflows.

That's why, when needed, I collaborate with people whose work I hold in high professional regard.

For classic funding research and grant applications, I can draw on the Förderlotsen network. For research and science funding, I work with Sabine Dzuck. For technical reviews and implementation, I can bring in partners such as N3XTCODER.

For you, this means: you don't get an off-the-shelf solution, but support that fits your specific situation.

How an inquiry works

1. You send me your key details

Write me a short note about what you have in mind:

  • What organization are you?
  • What does your grant funding work involve?
  • Which AI tools do you already use or plan to introduce?
  • Which questions or use cases are currently on the table?
  • Are you looking for orientation, hands-on practice, a KI-Werkstatt, or longer-term support?
  • Is there already a timeframe or budget?

2. We talk about your situation

In a short preliminary call, we clarify what makes sense for you.

Sometimes a compact Impulsseminar is enough. Sometimes a Praxisworkshop is the better starting point. And sometimes it makes sense to plan a KI-Werkstatt after an initial session, resulting in a strategic roadmap for your next steps.

3. You receive a written proposal

After our conversation, I'll prepare a proposal tailored to you, including the process, content, and costs.

You decide at your own pace whether it's the right fit.

Fees

The exact costs depend on the format, scope, and preparation involved. As a guide:

Introductory talk / Impulsseminarfrom 840 € plus VAT
Half-day sessionfrom 1,200 € plus VAT
Full-day workshopfrom 1,600 € plus VAT
KI-Werkstattdepending on scope and structure
Monthly supportdepending on needs and scope

For in-person formats, travel costs, accommodation if needed, and additional travel time apply. For larger transformation projects or projects involving technical implementation, I'll prepare an individual proposal.

Frequently asked questions

Can the formats take place online or in person?

Yes. Many formats work very well online, because we can work directly in AI tools together. In-person formats are also possible, especially for hands-on or Werkstatt formats.

Does everyone on the team need prior experience with AI?

No. It's completely normal for experience levels to vary widely within a team. I make sure we build shared foundations while keeping those who are further along engaged.

Can we work with our own AI tool?

Yes. If you already work with a specific tool — for example Langdock, MS Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, or Mistral — we can build on that. It's important to clarify beforehand which features are available and which data may be used there.

Do we work on real projects or on examples?

In team formats, I prefer working on your real tasks. Depending on the format, that might be project ideas, past applications, funding programs, text modules, internal processes, or specific application questions.

Can this actually result in working assistants or skills?

Yes, if it fits the format. In Praxisworkshops, KI-Werkstatt formats, or ongoing support, first prompts, assistants, agent skills, or workflows can take shape. Depending on the tool and technical environment, they can be usable right away or developed further as prototypes.

Do you also help with funding research or grant applications?

Only to a limited extent, depending on capacity. My current focus is on training, concept development, and AI in grant funding work. For classic funding research or grant applications, I collaborate with colleagues from my network when needed.

Can we record the seminar?

We can clarify that in our preliminary call. For internal purposes, recording is generally possible if everyone involved agrees and the conditions are clarified in advance.

How quickly can we start?

That depends on the format and my current workload. For smaller online formats, a date is often available sooner than for larger hands-on or in-person formats. The best way is to send me your key details — then I can give you a realistic estimate.

Ready to put AI to real use in your grant funding work?

Then just send me a few key details about your organization, your questions, and your preferred timeframe.

I'll get back to you and tell you honestly which format I think makes sense — or whether someone else from my network is a better fit.

Or email me directly: hallo@mirapape.de